Well, actually there are learning styles who are older than the theory by Gardner, but they are, as you can read here again and again, a myth…
Before becoming a writer, I spent a year-and-a-half training as a science teacher and then working at a secondary school in Croydon. During my short stint in education, the biggest buzzword was “differentiation.” We were told that any given class contains pupils with a range of abilities, and that different children have different learning styles.
This second idea was drilled into us over and over again. Some children are visual learners, who acquire and process information best through images; others are auditory learners, who learn best by listening; and yet others are kinaesthetic learners, who learn best by doing physical activities. To be effective teachers, we had to try to establish each child’s preferred learning style, so that we could tailor our teaching style and materials accordingly.
The idea of learning styles is based on the theory of multiple of intelligences, developed in the early 1980s by psychologist Howard Gardner
View original post 469 more words
[…] Actually, Gardner has also said this already a long time ago, but still it’s worth nothing that in a new article he repeats that MI shouldn’t be confused with the debunked learning styles. […]
[…] discusses many topics we have blogged about (left-right brain thinking, learning styles, brain gym and is really also harsh on multiple intelligences). But he also focuses on the […]
[…] readers of this blog will know that learning styles are an urban myth in education. This new research by researchers at the University of Iowa describesthat when it comes to memory, […]
[…] it seems that as learning styles don’t exist, how we are oriented might have an influence on how we make moral […]
[…] than you wonder, wait a minute, learning styles are a myth, no? Well, the authors discuss this discussion to a great length, but state that most of the discussion […]
[…] The myth of learning styles […]