Research Counts for Little When It Comes to Adopting “Personalized Learning”

Good oversight by Larry Cuban

Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

The K-12 sector is investing heavily in technology as a means of providing students with a more customized educational experience. So far, though, the research evidence behind “personalized learning” remains thin.

Ben Herold, Education Week, October 18, 2016

The pushers of computer-based instruction want districts to buy products and then see if the product works. Students and teachers are being used for marketing research, unreimbursed research. Districts are spending money based on hype and tests of the educational efficacy of an extremely narrow range of products as if this is a reasonable way to proceed in this era of extreme cuts in budgets.

Laura Chapman, comment on above guest post, May 21, 2017

Both Ben Herold and Laura Chapman are correct in their statements about the thinness of research on “personalized learning” and that districts spend “money based on hype and tests of the educational efficacy of an extremely…

View original post 1,601 more words

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Education

2 responses to “Research Counts for Little When It Comes to Adopting “Personalized Learning”

  1. Pingback: Interesting read: Adaptive practice, personalized learning, and what will “obviously” work in education. | From experience to meaning...

  2. Pingback: Everybody should read this: The Silicon Valley Billionaires Remaking America’s Schools | From experience to meaning...

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s