Another explanation for the Flynn effect: lead

The Flynn Effect is …” the substantial and long-sustained increase in both fluid and crystallized intelligence test scores measured in many parts of the world from roughly 1930 to the present day.” (Thank you Wikipedia)

And there have been many reasons mentioned why this has happened, but this study has a quite novel explanation for the effect from the seventies on: lead, or rather the decrease in U.S. blood lead levels. Still, someone in the back is coughing ‘correlation’, and indeed it is.

Abstract of the study:

The dramatic decrease in U.S. blood lead levels (BLLs) since the 1970s has been documented-however, the anticipated societal impact on intelligence quotient (IQ) has not. The objectives of this study were to determine whether mean IQs of American adults, adjusted for demographics, have increased in concert with society׳s decreasing BLL.
METHODS:
Mean IQs of eight normal adult cohorts (N=800), tested individually in 2007 by trained clinicians, were compared using ANCOVA and correlation analysis. Cohorts ranged in mean societal BLLs from 4 1/2μg/dL (born 1985-1987) to 19μg/dL (born 1963-1972). IQs were adjusted for confounders-education, gender, ethnicity, region, urban status. To control for age, we analyzed IQ data for a second adult sample (N=800), tested in 1995-all born when BLLs were high (1951-1975, BLL ≥15μg/dL).
RESULTS:
When controlling for education, gender, ethnicity, and region, the regression of IQs on BLLs was significant (r=-0.84, p<0.01); the modeled change in BLLs from 20 to 4μg/dL suggests predicted increases of 3.8 IQ points (95% CI, 1.4-6.2). Also controlling for urban status produced significance (r=-0.88, p<0.01) with predicted increases of 5.2 points (95% CI, 2.4-8.0). Control analyses ruled out aging as a confounder.
CONCLUSIONS:
The dramatic societal decreases in BLLs in the U.S. since the 1970s were associated with a 4-5-point increase in the mean IQs of Americans. This effect is consistent with researchers’ predictions; however, other variables (e.g., medical advances) may have contributed to the IQ gains.

4 Comments

Filed under Research

4 responses to “Another explanation for the Flynn effect: lead

  1. Flynn effect facts

    A far more coherent account of the matter is given in “Rising–falling mercury pollution causing the rising–falling IQ of the Lynn–Flynn effect, as predicted by the antiinnatia theory of autism and IQ” as linked here:
    http://authors.elsevier.com/a/1Qj2gheKdPzqM
    The lead is merely a correlation, and has not correlated for most of that time anyway.

  2. Pingback: New study on the Flynn-effect shows possible explanations, why does our IQ rise? | From experience to meaning...

  3. Pingback: New study shows reversed Flynn-effect: no more rising IQ’s? | From experience to meaning...

  4. Pingback: Elke keer ik lees dat intelligentie deterministisch is… (opgelet veel links) | X, Y of Einstein?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.