Last week I received a complaint that I was too kind for Howard Gardner as we didn’t call his multiple intelligences theory a myth. The reason why we used the label ‘nuanced’ is because the basis philosophy that people differ can’t be labeled as wrong. Still we gave a lot of reasons why one should be cautious about this very popular theory. And lately Gardner himself outed the theory as being outdated and ill-researched.
But this paragraph tweeted by Stuart Ritchie is making me grinch:
This quote is coming from this video:
Now, the video is older than the own-debunking I mentioned before on this blog, but Casper made a good comment on Twitter about the mixed message Gardner is giving:
So: Gardner says his theory isn’t supported at all, he even acknowledges that the theories he opposes to do have scientific evidence supporting their theory, but he still defends his own theory because of it’s usefulness. Btw, this is one of the most common replies to any of the myths Paul, Casper and myself have tackled: “hey, I know it’s rubbish, but I think it is useful.”
What chance does the ordinary practitioner have when it comes to sorting the wheat from the chaff? We really don’t have the time for this nonsense. I spend most of my spare reading time on debunking articles & that’s a full-time job in itself.
Reblogged this on kadir kozan.
Reblogged this on The Echo Chamber.