When I first read the article it made me think about people in the 19th century thought it was a good idea to teach children about hygiene in the hope it would also have an effect on their parents, hopefully resulting in less sick days. But this study is much less ‘paternalistic’. The researchers from the University of Illinois discovered something extraordinary when they tested a program designed to reduce sibling conflict. Both parents benefited from a lessening of hostilities on the home front. But mothers experienced a more direct reward. As they viewed the children’s sessions in real time on a video monitor and coached the kids at home to respond as they’d been taught, moms found that, like their kids, they were better able to manage their own emotions during stressful moments in comparison to the control-group. Although the sample-size is rather small, an interesting result.
From the press release:
“Parenting more than one child is stressful, and until now, there have been few ways to help parents deal with their own distress when children squabble. Many parents, especially mothers, use how their kids are getting along as a barometer for how well they’re doing as a parent. This is true even though virtually all siblings have some conflict,” said Laurie Kramer, a University of Illinois professor of applied family studies and co-author of the study.
When children fight with their siblings, they learn important lessons, such as how to settle, negotiate, and compromise. They begin to see conflict as a problem they can solve, said Niyantri Ravindran, a graduate student in Kramer’s and Nancy McElwain’s laboratories and lead author of the study.
These findings are well established, but what scientists did not yet know was whether parents also benefit when their offspring learn to interact more positively.
The study compared parents of siblings in Kramer’s More Fun with Sisters and Brothers Program with a control group composed of parents of non-participants. In families participating in the program, parents reported that the intense negative emotions they experience when their children fight were reduced as their children learned to get along better. Importantly, this was true for both mothers and fathers.
The More Fun with Brothers and Sisters program is a five-session intervention that teaches four- to eight-year-olds a set of social and emotional competencies that are important for good sibling relationships. These skills include how to see a problem from a sibling’s perspective, how to identify and talk about a wide range of emotions, how to calm themselves when they’re experiencing intense feelings, and how to manage conflicts, she said.
The More Fun with Sisters and Brothers Program operates on the premise that sibling relationships don’t always need to be conflictual — with some work, they can be vastly improved.
“We sometimes have to be very intentional and teach our children how to interact well with each other,” Kramer explained. “We can’t expect young children to figure out how to manage these complex relationships on their own.”
In addition to watching the sessions on a closed circuit TV, parents received a handout after each meeting that described the session’s objectives, the words used to describe the relationship skills, and specific suggestions for what parents could say to guide children to manage a conflict using the skills the children have learned.
To encourage families to use the skills at home where they really need them, the researchers sent home lesson-specific bedtime stories, a board game with cards and questions, an activity book, and a CD with a rap song that summarizes the skills the siblings learned.
It is notable that the study found that not only do siblings profit from More Fun with Sisters and Brothers, parents do as well. But why did moms and dads differ in the ways they benefited from the program?
Studies show that fathers and mothers interact with children differently. “Dads tend to get more involved with their kids when they are playing whereas mothers tend to coach their children more,” Kramer said.
“As mothers watched us work on these concepts with their children and did the homework we’d slipped in, they learned some of the same strategies that their children did, and that helped them to better handle their own emotions.
“Mothers appear to have incorporated the skills their children were taught into the way they manage their own emotions. For example, they were significantly more likely to reframe their children’s bickering as a normal and manageable part of the sibling relationship and were less likely to let their emotions interfere with being an effective parent,” Kramer said.
In contrast, fathers who noticed more warmth between their children following the program were better able to manage their negative emotions when their children did squabble. This may be because they now felt more confident that their children would be able to manage any conflict that did erupt as a result of the skills they learned from the program.
Abstract of the study:
In this study, we assessed whether an intervention designed to improve children’s sibling relationships, the More Fun with Sisters and Brothers program (MFWSB), may also help parents manage their emotions more effectively. Families with at least 2 children between the ages of 4 and 8 years were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 50) or wait-list control (n = 34) group. Parents completed pre- and posttest questionnaires on sibling warmth and agonism, their emotion regulation during sibling conflict, and their global emotion regulation styles. Program participation had a direct effect on 3 of the 4 emotion regulation outcomes for mothers. Mothers in the intervention versus control group reported lower levels of dysregulation and suppression and higher levels of reappraisal at posttest, controlling for pretest regulation scores. Additionally, path models examining posttest responses showed that participation in MFWSB led to lower levels of maternal and paternal negative reactivity in the sibling context via lower levels of sibling agonism, controlling for pretest levels of negative reactivity. Alternate path models, with parents’ emotion regulation as mechanisms linking MFWSB and sibling relationship quality, were tested but not supported. Results highlight the value of a sibling-focused intervention for promoting parents’ abilities to regulate their emotions.