The next couple of years we can expect more technological innovations, also in education. Google card board? Oculus rift? An evolution of MOOC’s? Time will tell (or Gartner will try to predict). Technology has changed a lot, also in education. But… does this mean that all will be different? No, those so-called digital natives (no, really don’t) don’t see technology as substitute for everyday student engagement and collaboration as this hasn’t been changing that much looking back to 1990.

From the press release:

The study, published in Computers & Education, was the culmination of 20 years of analysis of 1,105 courses dating back to 1990, the year that spawned the World Wide Web.

Concordia researchers Robert Bernard, Eugene Borokhovski and Richard Schmid were part of a team that probed how things changed over two decades: from PowerPoint presentations to virtual reality; from when computers ran on floppy disks to every student packing a smartphone.

They found that the most obvious positive impact of technology on education was reflected in cognitive tools that helped show what was being studied — like a demonstration of how a cell divides, or the details of the internal organs of a medical patient.

Such tools allow students to explore content in greater depth through simulations, games and virtual learning environments.

“Students can now look at images and manipulate things that would previously have been impossible to engage with in any other way,” says Bernard. “They allow you to accidentally blow up a laboratory without killing anyone.”

The Internet has also allowed students to take control when it comes to exploring information and ideas. But how much information can anyone absorb just by looking up web pages at random?

“The best instruction is structured and meaningful,” says Borokhovski. “Being guided by a teacher, while sharing ideas and experiences with peers, motivates you to be proactive in ways you can’t do alone.”

Concordia research also concluded that ongoing face-to-face communication with fellow students is still a critical aspect of college or university learning. Peers can stay in contact more conveniently than ever, but relationships are forged within the common study environment — something that is more difficult to replicate online.

“Students learn a great deal from each other,” says Schmid. “They can’t be a sole source of knowledge, but nor is it a case of the blind leading the blind. Plenty of learning comes from having the ability to exchange ideas and challenge one another’s thoughts.”

Moreover, campus life continues to have a profound influence on individual growth, which extends to society as a whole. “You can’t underestimate the credibility that comes with the experience,” says Schmid. “It remains a very important social step.”

So, even if every detail that’s presented to college or university students is just a Google search away, the post-secondary institution is at no risk of losing its inherent value.

“Consider how much effort it takes to learn beyond the obvious,” says Bernard. “If you really want to learn how to write code or be a doctor, or any of the things that require time and effort, there’s a reason that these complex skills don’t come naturally to everyone.”

“People may have illusions that technology is making things easier and easier when it’s quite often the opposite,” says Borokhovski.

“When the Internet was first introduced, it added value to the learning process, but that surge didn’t continue with each new development. We have to focus learning to a greater degree now, rather than jumping from one trend to another.”

Abstract of the study:

Although the overall research literature on the application of educational technologies to classroom instruction tends to favor their use over their non-use these results vary considerably depending on what kind of technology is used, who it is used with and, more importantly, under what circumstances and for what instructional purposes it is used. This meta-analysis summarizes data from 674 independent primary studies that compared higher degrees of technology use in the experimental with technology-leaner control conditions in terms of their effects on student learning outcomes in postsecondary education. We found an overall average weighted effect size of g+ = 0.27 (k = 879, p < .01), indicating low but significant positive effect of technology integration on learning. The follow-up analyses revealed significant influence of educational technology used for cognitive support blended learning instructional settings designed interaction treatments, and technology integration in teacher