Best Evidence in Brief: Out-of-school time study programs improve results for poorer students

There is a new Best Evidence in Brief and this time I want to pick this study from this great newsletter (in which the insight hidden in the last sentence is also very interesting):

A project funded by the Nuffield Foundation in the UK looked at the effect of out-of-school-time (OST) study programs on GCSE performance in England (GCSEs are national high-stakes exams given at the end of secondary school).

Using data from the Next Steps longitudinal study of young people, Francis Green and Nicola Pensiero from the Institute of Education recorded the results of those who undertook their GCSEs in 2006. They found that teacher-led OST study groups were moderately effective in improving overall GCSE performance, particularly for children from disadvantaged and lower socioeconomic backgrounds. For children whose parents were unemployed or in routine occupations, an improvement equivalent to approximately two grades was shown on their overall GCSE score.

While OST study programs are available to children from all backgrounds in the vast majority of secondary schools in the UK, the research showed that 42% of children whose parents are unemployed take part compared to 46% of children from a professional background.

The research found no statitistical benefit from programs that were self-directed by students.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under At home, Education, Research

One response to “Best Evidence in Brief: Out-of-school time study programs improve results for poorer students

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s