New study on the differences between under, normal and overachievers

After the PISA-storm it’s time to get back to business… in getting education better for everybody. And this study may help as it shows that learning strategies are key to academic achievement – which isn’t new – but they made an interesting comparison between under, normal and over-achievers. They also described behavioral interventions that could reverse underachievement, but the latter are more educated guesses than the first insights that are actually backed by this study.

From the press release (bold by me):

Not all children do well in school, despite being intellectually capable. Whilst parental relationships, motivation and self-concept all have a role to play, a recent study published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology shows that children’s learning strategy is key for academic success.

The study showed that students with normal scores on intellectual tests but that have poor grades in secondary school are also not as good at acquiring and retaining information, or later applying it.

Lead researcher of the study and professor at the University of Alicante in Spain, Juan Castejón, concludes that underachieving students appear to employ all of the learning strategies considered, but to a lesser extent than normal and overachieving students, and this seems to be the key for academic success.

“The underachievers group of students also has poorer attitudes to learning goals, poorer relationships with their parents, and lower emotional stability than their peers,” says Castejón, “but learning strategies showed the strongest relationship with achievement.”

By comparing underachievers with normal- or over-achievers, the work brings new insight on how educational interventions may help those in academic difficulty.

“At the moment, Spain has a school drop-out rate of more than twice the EU average,” says Castejón. “We believe that underachieving students could be contributing to this, so it is really important to guide teachers, counsellors and parents on how they can help.”

Learning strategies can respond well to behavioural interventions, so there is hope that with the right help from teachers and carers, underachievement is reversible. Castejón believes that teachers should focus on reinforcing these learning strategies and goals, and promote autonomy and responsibility in their students.

“Self-regulating models in which goals, strategies and self-concept are integrated would help improve academic achievement,” concludes the researcher.

“It is also important that teachers and parents are positive towards, and encourage, their children,” Castejón explains, “as better self-esteem in our kids leads to better efforts and achievements.”

To define underachievement, the researchers looked at the mismatch between expected achievement and actual achievement. For this, they took standardized measures of each child’s intellectual abilities to define academic expectation, and of their school grades, to define academic achievement. The researchers also looked at a range of behaviours including learning strategies and goals, and relationships with their parents and peers.

But it was when they explored various aspects of learning strategies that they had insights. Learning strategies involve selection, organization and information processing, creative and critic thinking, information recovery and transference, in addition to planning, evaluation, and information control and monitoring.

“The discovery of the importance of learning strategies is vital in developing new ways to help our children fulfil their academic potential,” says Castejón.

“Our work shows the need to understand not only the causes of underachievement, but also how they differ with overachievement,” says Castejón, “so we can target interventions inspired by how overachievers use their behaviours to excel,” he explains.

What this study also highlights is how research can help professional development and training of teachers, in Spain, and probably in other countries.

“At the moment, there is a tendency for educational research and teacher-training to be completely separate, with little crossover of ideas,” says Castejón. “What we need are more professionals who can cross the science-policy boundary, and use research to guide how we teach.”

Castejón and his research group are continuing their studies to examine new possibilities. “We believe that there may be sub-groups of students with particular characteristics within the underachievers,” says Castejón. “We want to look at them more thoroughly, which will help us to really individualise our recommendations for these children.”

Abstract of the study:

The aims of this work were to identify and establish differential characteristics in learning strategies, goal orientations, and self-concept between overachieving, normal-achieving and underachieving secondary students. A total of 1400 Spanish first and second year high school students from the South-East geographical area participated in this study. Three groups of students were established: a group with underachieving students, a group with a normal level of achievement, and a third group with overachieving students. The students were assigned to each group depending on the residual punctuations obtained from a multiple regression analysis in which the punctuation of an IQ test was the predictor and a measure composed of the school grades of nine subjects was the criteria. The results of one-way ANOVA and the Games-Howell post-hoc test showed that underachieving students had significantly lower punctuations in all of the measures of learning strategies and learning goals, as well as all of the academic self-concept, personal self-concept, parental relationship, honesty, and personal stability factors. In contrast, overachieving students had higher punctuations than underachieving students in the same variables and higher punctuations than normal-achieving students in most of the variables in which significant differences were detected. These results have clear educational implications.

One thought on “New study on the differences between under, normal and overachievers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.