Talking in class boosts progress in math, science, and English (Best evidence in brief)

There is a new Best Evidence in Brief and in it, you can read about this study:

An intervention that trained teachers to improve and monitor the quality of classroom talk had a positive impact on primary students’ test scores in English, math, and science, a report published by the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) in the UK reveals.
Seventy-six primary schools with higher-than-average proportions of disadvantaged students took part in a randomized control trial of the Dialogic Teaching intervention, which is designed to improve the quality of classroom talk as a means of increasing students’ engagement, learning, and achievement. Year 5 (4th grade in the U.S.) teachers in 38 schools (2,493 students), and a teacher mentor from each school, received resources and training from the delivery team, and then implemented the intervention over the course of the fall and spring terms in the 2015/16 school year. A control group of 38 schools (2,466 students) continued with business as usual. Following the intervention, students were tested in English, math, and science.
The results showed that students in the intervention schools did better in the main outcome measures of English (effect size = +0.16), science (+0.12), and math (+0.09) when compared with children in the control schools who didn’t receive the intervention. For students who received free school meals, the intervention had a higher impact on math (+0.16), but around the same for English (+0.12) and science (+0.11). Teachers reported positive effects on student engagement and confidence, and on the whole the intervention was highly regarded by participating schools. However, some teachers felt that it would take longer than two terms to fully embed a Dialogic Teaching approach in their classrooms.
Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Education, Research

2 responses to “Talking in class boosts progress in math, science, and English (Best evidence in brief)

  1. Effect size of only 0.16 is not very great.! There are many other interventions which have an effect size over 0.34 which is regarded as the bench mark.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s