This study on parental regret surprised me. Not that some parents regret having children. I can imagine this to be the case in some situations. But this Rutgers study examined the reasons why parents had children in the first place, although they were asked to look back in hindsight. And that FOMO turns up to be one of the possible reasons.
From the press release:
Keeping up with the Joneses — social envy — can push people toward things they might otherwise avoid, like buying a car they can’t afford or building an extension they don’t need.
It also might be a motivator for becoming a parent, a Rutgers study finds.
Roughly one in every 14 parents in the United States, about 7 percent, say they wouldn’t have children if they could do it over again. Rates of parental regret are even higher in parts of Europe, such as Germany (8 percent) and Poland (13.6 percent). One of the main reasons that regretful parents have children in the first place may be fear of missing out, more colloquially known as “FOMO.”
“Why do you really want to have a child? What are your motivations?” said Kristina M. Scharp, an associate professor in the Rutgers School of Communication and Information and coauthor of the study in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. “In the context of what it means to be a parent, FOMO could be a valuable consideration.”
Parental regret is antithetical to how parents are expected to feel about their children. Social norms suggest that parents, and especially mothers, are “supposed to love their children unconditionally from conception to eternity,” the researchers wrote.
To understand what moved regretful parents to start a family, the researchers collected narratives from Reddit’s /r/childfree subreddit, an online community of 1.5 million child-free users. Moderators allow parents who express regret about having children to post to the subreddit, which has cataloged 85 such testimonies between 2011 and 2021.
Scharp and her colleagues coded the Reddit posts with items such as “investment of time” and “relationship sacrifices.” Codes were then grouped into themes — such as “resource-intensive work” — which helped illuminate so-called discourses. Three discourses from regretful parents emerged: parenting as heaven; parenting as hell; and parenting as (the only) choice.
Finally, the researchers examined how these discourses interacted to guide decision making about having children. What they found was a new, previously unconsidered, driver: FOMO.The findings have broad implications for family planning.
“By better understanding potential motivations for their actions, people might be more inclined to make value-concordant, autonomous reproductive decisions,” the researchers wrote.
With access to abortion in the United States increasingly restricted, the potential for parental regret should be included in reproductive counseling services, they added.
“Because of social norms, anyone who doesn’t subscribe to dominant views on parenting gets marginalized or stigmatized,” said Scharp. “Sometimes social norms are good. We know it’s wrong to steal. But sometimes social norms have unintended consequences and punish people for their choices — including people who want to be child-free.”
Abstract of the study:
Guided by relational dialectics theory (RDT), we analyzed 85 first-person testimonials of parental regret written by users of the /r/childfree subreddit. We interrogated how competing discourses animate what it means to be a parent (our semantic object). Contrapuntal analysis revealed dominant and marginalized Discourses of Parenting as Heaven (DPHN) and Parenting as Hell on Earth (DPHL), respectively, as well as a third Discourse of Parenting as (the Only) Choice (DPOC). We identified three kinds of dialogically contractive practices including a new form we call fear of missing out (FOMO), two forms of diachronic separation, four forms of synchronic interplay including a new form we introduce (i.e., allying) that is useful when more than two discourses compete, and one form of dialogic transformation. We argue that FOMO serves as a catalyst for diachronic separation. We offer practical implications for fencesitters (those “on the fence” about having children), counselors, and policymakers.